logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 상주지원 2018.06.19 2017고정138
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반(명예훼손)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall defame another person by openly pointing out false facts through an information and communications network with intent to defame another person.

Nevertheless, the defendant's photograph and the victim's photograph and the safety personnel at the time when he/she did not hold a formal instructor's license, who is the head of the Scco-sure and the safety personnel at the time he/she did not hold a formal instructor's license, will be in charge of the leader of the daily sports swimming pool instructor's leader in the local area as his/her official seal, in order to slander the victim's D at the defendant's office located in C at around 03:00 on August 9, 2017.

Dozk dyp dyp dyp fin of many public officials who are damaged by this human being

It is still trying to report its honor to the relevant police station without recognizing their mistake.

This will also be open to the public with a view to the public in the nation, as it is installed in the following ways: (a) will be able to take criminal care only; and (b) will also be open to the public.

A notice was posted stating “.......”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Data to cut down a sign on the north of the Facebook;

1. Determination as to the defendant and his defense counsel's assertion of the investigation report (Evidence No. 15) (Evidence List No.

1. The defendant and his defense counsel expressed that the notice of this case posted by the defendant on the Pest North Korea was open to the public, not as a whole, and that the victim was obstructed, and thus, there is no performance.

However, according to each of the above evidence, the victim was admitted not only to directly see the victim of defamation but also to see it by other persons than the victim. Even according to the defendant's assertion, the posting of this case can be seen by the defendant's campaignor North Korea.

arrow