Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, as to the defendants, two years have passed from the date of confirmation of each judgment.

Punishment of the crime

Defendants are those in a marital relationship, and victims are those in a marital relationship.

On May 30, 2015, at around 20:04, the Defendants, including J, K, L, etc., conducted daily test on May 30, 2015, on the grounds that the victims’ children aged 6-7 years and aged flick flick flflflf flflflf flflf flflf flflf flf flflf flflf flf flflf flflf flflf flflf flf flfl, and Defendant A flflddd flflf flf flflf flf flflf flfl, and the victim’s head and flflf flflf flf flfld, and the victim’s face and flf flflf flflfl.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witnessO, Q, R and P;

1. A fire-proof report (in-site CCTV), CCTV images, CDs, and photographs to take a course;

1. Each injury diagnosis report, damage photograph (the Defendants and defense counsel, even if each injury was found in their holding, asserts that such act constitutes a legitimate act or legitimate defense.

In light of the motive and circumstance leading up to the fighting with the victims, the degree and consequence of the act of injury, and all other circumstances revealed in the records of this case, such as the situation before and after the fighting, it is reasonable to view that each act by the Defendants cannot be deemed to be merely a passive defensive act, and it does not constitute a legitimate defense, and it cannot be recognized as a legitimate act permissible in light of social norms.

Therefore, we cannot accept the above argument.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and the choice of punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;