logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.08.26 2015나106279
영업비 지급 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: "Franch Project" in Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court; "Franch Project" in Part 2 of the second instance judgment; "Franch Zone 1" in Part 3; "Franch 63 Simt" in the first instance judgment; "Franch 63 Simt" in the third, fourth, and first 11" respectively; "Franch 58,725,500" in Part 3; "Franch 5,725,00" in Part 4; "Franch 30,725,000" shall be deleted; "Franch 20,000,0000, which shall be paid to the plaintiff at the last 30,0000,0000, which shall be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff at the time of the above establishment of new and renewable energy supply project; "Franch 30,14,170000,000,0000 evidence and 314,01.

arrow