The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment) by the lower court (referring to six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are no new circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be reflected in the sentencing after the court below sentenced the judgment.

In full view of all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, relationship with the victim, motive and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., as well as the fact that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime at the time of the crime in this case, the lower court’s sentencing is too unreasonable because it goes beyond the reasonable scope of discretion.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.