The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment) by the lower court (e., one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. There are no new circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be reflected in the sentencing after the court below sentenced the judgment.

In full view of all the circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, relationship with victims, motive means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the crime of this case, the sentencing of the lower court does not seem to be excessively heavy beyond the reasonable discretion, as well as the fact that the Defendant was punished for the same kind of crime at the time of the crime of this case.

The defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing cannot be accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

[However, the judgment of the court below shall correct "Road Traffic Act" in accordance with Article 25 (1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure to "former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 16037, Dec. 24, 2018)."