beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The defendant, from around 2010 to around 2010, was in possession of D's identification card that B knew in the process of receiving a loan in the name of her woman's friendship in the process of obtaining a loan from her woman's friendship, and the defendant, without the consent of D in the joint and several guarantee contract for the above loan, referring to the documents as if D were jointly and severally and severally and applied for the loan, and then received the loan to use it for personal purpose.
1. On December 24, 2012, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s home located in Gangnam-gu Seoul building F, forged a contract for the guarantee of loan transaction under the name of D and forged one copy of the contract for the guarantee of loan transaction under the name of D by stating “D”, “H 1st floor at the Government of Gyeonggi-si,” “gold million won” in the column of the amount of guarantee obligation, “Y 24 December 2012” in the column of the contract date for the guarantee obligation, “F 26 December 26, 2017” in the column of the due date, and then submitted the said contract as if it had been duly formed to the employee in charge of the loan of G (State) who was aware of the forgery on the same day.
As a result, the Defendant conspired with B to forge and use a loan transaction guarantee contract in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations, as well as to forge and use it. From the above date to January 3, 2013, the Defendant conspired with B, in collusion with B, and forged and used a loan transaction guarantee contract in the name of D four times in total.
2. On December 24, 2012, the Defendant submitted a forged loan guarantee contract to the employee in charge of the victim G (owner)’s loan from the Defendant’s house located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul building E-gu Seoul building F, as described in paragraph 1, and had the employee in charge transfer the loan KRW 10 million to B.
Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim in collusion with B.