A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On March 14, 2015, at around 19:50, the Defendant received 112 reports from the 3rd floor of the building in Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, the third floor of the building in the 2015, and committed assault, such as: (a) the Defendant: (b) the Defendant: (c) the police officer of the Ansan-gu Police Station, who called the site, prevented the Defendant who is dissatisfied with the daily happiness; and (d) the police officer of the Ansan-gu, Police Station, Police Station of the Ansan-gu, Police Station, who called the site; (b)

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of order of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing recording records;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the choice of punishment for the crime [the scope of recommendation] The basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties is nonexistent [the decision of sentence] [no person who is a special person] [the decision of a sentence]] favorable circumstances that reflects the unfavorable circumstances: The defendant committed the crime of this case during the suspension of execution due to the obstruction of performance of official duties: The defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the background of the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime, etc.