logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.11.26 2014고단7419
공무집행방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 16, 2014, at around 02:20, the Defendant: (a) made a 112 report on the fact that, while being drunk in the fourth floor of the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City C Multi-household 4’s corridor, it was difficult for neighbors to avoid a disturbance to a large urine, and that, (b) made it possible for the Defendant to return home to the site by sending a slope belonging to the Seoul Southern-dong Police Station D District E, Incheon, and used it on the ground that the above police officer was under the influence of alcohol, and (c) made it difficult for the Defendant to take care of the Defendant by assaulting the face of the police officer twice in the manner of drinking, thereby hindering the police officer’s legitimate performance of his duties, such as filing a report of 12 times by assaulting him.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement to E;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the "justifiable circumstances") of the suspended sentence;

1. The scope of the sentencing guidelines for recommendation [the scope of the sentencing guidelines] the basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of the performance of official duties (the obstruction of the performance of official duties) (the scope of the sentencing guidelines];

2. The decision of sentence is made by the defendant who has led to confessions and reflects of the crime of this case, and the first degree of visual impairment could not be seen well before the crime of this case, and the punishment is determined as ordered in consideration of the age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances after the crime, etc. of the defendant.

arrow