(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단4972

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.02.22 2017고단4972

사기

Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A On August 11, 2017, the sentence of imprisonment with prison labor of four months for fraud was sentenced to two years, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 19, 2017.

Defendant

B On November 15, 2016, sentenced to six months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the support for the development of water sources and sources, the judgment became final and conclusive on August 17, 2017.

[2017 Highest 4972]

1. In collusion with E and B, the Defendant offered loans to those who have difficulty in making a normal loan in line with the terms and conditions of the loan, and offered loans in installments.

A. The Defendant, in collusion with E and B on May 15, 2017, concluded that “If the Defendant borrowed money to the victim that he/she runs a brokerage business for lending and left for approximately 15% of the performance as incentives, 10% out of 15% of the total amount of the loan will be paid and the loan will be repaid.”

However, the fact that the injured party did not have the intention or ability to repay the loan even if the injured party took out the loan.

In collusion with E and B, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) obtained a total of KRW 20,00,000 from a savings bank, etc. on May 15, 2017; and (c) obtained a total of KRW 5,940,000 from the account in the name of B on the same day on the same day on May 16, 2017; and (c) obtained a transfer of KRW 5,949,000 to the same account in the name of B on the same day on the same day on the same day; and (d) obtained a total of KRW 6,60,000 from the cash delivery on the same day.

B. In collusion with E and B on May 19, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If the Defendant borrowed money to operate a loan brokerage business and to have approximately 15% of the actual performance with incentives, 10% out of 15% of the total amount of 15% and the Defendant would have repaid the loan.”

However, there was no intention or ability to repay the loan even if the injured party has lent the money with the loan.

The defendant, in collusion with E and B, is a victim.

유사 판례

-인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.07.11 2019고단1157

-의정부지방법원 2017.09.21 2017고단3682

-서울중앙지방법원 2017.06.02 2017고단1160

-서울북부지방법원 2021.02.03 2020고단4140

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2017.08.29 2017고단718