Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

A. Around 08:30 on August 30, 2013, the Defendant driven B 5 passenger cars under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.174% from the section of approximately 50 meters, from the 50m to the front road of the entrance road located in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, where the trade name located in a non-fluence area is unknown, prior to a drinking house that is located in the same roof, the Defendant driven B 5 passenger cars under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.174%.

B. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) is a person driving a B K5 vehicle.

At the same time as above, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.174% at the same time as above, and continued the intersection in front of the exit of the school subway station No. 1 in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, with the speed of speed on the speed of the city from the direction of the entrance No. 10 in the school subway station No. 10 in the city.

At all times, since only the direction of driving in the customs remote distance direction is an intersection where signal apparatus is installed, a person engaged in driving of a vehicle shall make a good report on the traffic situation of the vehicle and proceed with it after checking the safety so as not to obstruct the passage of the vehicle driving under the new subparagraph, and there was a duty of care to avoid driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol and was negligent in proceeding along the customs clearance distance on the side of the mastal East Station, leading to the customs clearance distance on the side of the four-lane, and was in the front part of the Crasta taxi vehicle, which was normally driven in accordance with the new subparagraph on the fourth-lanes of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As above, the Defendant suffered from the injury of the victim E (the 26-year age), who is the passenger of the said taxi, due to the negligence in the course of driving a motor vehicle while driving the motor vehicle normally due to drinking, for about two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1..