logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2014.02.06 2013고합196
현주건조물방화등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[Criminal Power] On April 19, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to nine months of imprisonment with labor for violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death and Injury resulting from Dangerous Driving) in the Gwangju District Court’s net support on April 19, 2012, and completed the execution of the above punishment on November 9,

【Criminal Facts】

1. At around 02:20 on December 5, 2013, the present state building fire Defendant: (a) took a bath at the Defendant’s house located in Flusium C on the ground that Flusium D’s opposition to the purchase of vehicles; (b) she took a bath on the ground that Flusium D’s opposition to the purchase of vehicles; (c) she laid his/her clothes on the clothes inside the inner floor of the boiler, and she took them off by putting inflammable substances into the lusium in the boiler room and putting them out on the lusium in a lusium; and (d) flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusium flusing

Accordingly, the defendant destroyed the E-owned house used as a residence by D.

2. At around 18:30 on May 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) expressed a H frequency operated by the Victim G in F at F at F at F at F at F at the time of drinking, and (b) expressed that “this spawhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhn

3. At the time and place mentioned in Paragraph 2, the Defendant: (a) investigated the case circumstances against the police officer J and K, who belongs to the police station of the Jeonnam-gu Police Station, who called out after receiving a report that the Defendant was accompanied by the rioted operation, such as Paragraph 2, and (b); and (b) took the desire for the above police officers to “this franch ..................”; (c) boomed the fransh of J in his hand; and (d) boomed K’s flap to the fransh.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

[Article 1] The defendant's statement statement statement of the police about the defendant D [Article 2 and 3 at the time of sale].

arrow