1. The defendant shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won;

2. If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 10,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Notwithstanding the fact that anyone is unable to conduct an election campaign in the case of the election of a standing director, the Defendant, at the home of the Defendant located in Seodaemun-si around July 23, 2015, calls to D the representative who is the elector, using his mobile phone from the Defendant’s cell phone at door-si around July 23, 2015,

From the above day to July 30, 2015, “A election campaign was carried out by asserting support from the Defendant by telephone for 85 times in total to 77 representatives, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table,” etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E, F, G, H, I, K, K, L, M,O, P, Q, Q, R, M, T, U,V, W, X, Y, Z, AA, AB, AC, AD, AE, AE, AF, AF, AH, AH, AI, AJ, AAL, AM, N, and AO;

1. Application of A monetary details-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the relevant Act on criminal facts, and Articles 172(2)2, 50(6) and (2) of the Act on Agricultural Cooperative for the Selection of Punishment, the selection of fines (the fact that the defendant recognizes and reflects all of the crimes, and the fact that the defendant was already recommended by the personnel recommendation committee as a standing director at the time of conducting an election campaign, and the fact that the election campaign by the defendant did not have a significant impact on the result of an election campaign by the defendant after being recommended as a standing director at the personnel recommendation committee);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant is a candidate for a standing director of the AP Agricultural Cooperatives, which was conducted on July 31, 2015, and the candidate for an election of executive officers of a local agricultural cooperative from 180 days before the expiration date of the term of office to the election day of the executive officer was unable to provide, express an intention to provide, or promise to provide money, goods, or other property benefits to the members of the association. Notwithstanding the fact that the candidate for an election of executive officers of a local agricultural cooperative could not provide money, goods, or other property benefits to the members of the association from 180 days before the expiration date of the term of office of the executive officer to the election day, the Defendant’s “AS” operated by a member AR in Q Q from the early police officer on July 2015 to the