All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) is too unreasonable since the sentence imposed by the court below on the Defendants (a total of three years and six months of imprisonment, Defendant B: a total of three years and six months of imprisonment, Defendant C: a fine of KRW 5 million, Defendant C: a fine of KRW 4 million, Defendant F: imprisonment of KRW 1 year, etc.) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. Defendants A, E, A, and E have reached the first instance judgment, and they are against all of the instant crimes.

The Defendants deposited KRW 2 million with the victim of the crime of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint conflict) and the crime of assault by Defendant A, and KRW 2.120,000 to X as the victim of the crime of attack by Defendant A.

Defendants are not subject to punishment due to their violation of the Juvenile Protection Act, their violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles from Sexual Abuse, their brokerage of sexual traffic, etc.

The crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children against Sexual Abuse and the crime of violation of the Act on the Protection of Children against Sexual Abuse as stated in the judgment of the Defendants shall take into account the equality between the case where the judgment is rendered and the case where the offense of violation of the Act on the Protection of Juveniles against Sexual Abuse is concurrent crimes of the latter part after Article 37 of the Criminal Act.

However, the Defendants, who are the mother and child, employed several juveniles as harmful business establishments for a long time and forced them to provide entertainment services, forced them to engage in commercial sex acts, and conducted commercial sex acts, and forced the victims who did not fully pay their money, and arranged commercial sex acts by adults.

Defendant

A without registration, operated a tentatively named “report room” business, allowed some women to engage in commercial sex acts through the Internet hosting site, took money in the name of protection, and assaulted women employed.

Defendant

E arranged sexual traffic.

The crimes committed by these Defendants are extremely disadvantageous to the development of the sound sexuality of juveniles employed by juvenile harmful establishments.

The victims are the defendants.