logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 (제주) 2018.07.04 2018누1154
자동차운전면허취소처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation of this case is as follows, and this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, since it is identical to the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance except for the case as mentioned below (2).

2. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, even if the plaintiff's act was lost from "the other hand," No. 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance No. 3, 8, even if the plaintiff's act was committed, is viewed as "the crime of drinking driving at around 2002, even if it is recognized that the crime of driving at around 202 was pardoned, and that the sentence of punishment was invalidated because the crime of driving at around 202 was pardoned."

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow