Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Criminal facts

피고인은 2014. 4. 18. 00:50경 수원시 팔달구 D에 있는 E지구대에서 자신의 승차를 거부한 택시를 그냥 돌려보냈다는 이유로 방문하여 항의하던 중, E지구대 소속 경장 F, 순경 G가 시외로 나온 서울 택시이므로 수원시내에서 영업을 할 수 없음에 대하여 규정을 보여주며 수차례 설명을 해 주었음에도, “야이 씹새끼야, 어린 것들아, 얌마, 좆도 아닌 새끼들, 녹음해 놔 새끼야, 씹새끼들, 뭘 그만해 새끼야, 녹음해 새끼야, 녹음해 이제부터, 이 씨발놈들아, 니들이 민중의 경찰이냐, 이런 병신들, 안가 새끼야, 좆만한 새끼들이 누굴 병신 호구로 아나.“라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 순경 G의 어깨를 1회 밀치고, 그의 뒤통수를 1회 잡아당겨 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on civil petition treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the CD reproduction result (No. 13 of the evidence list);

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the crime of this case committed by assaulting a police officer in uniform while avoiding disturbance due to the finding of disturbance in the grounds for sentencing of the sentencing order under Article 334(1) shall not be deemed to be less than that of the crime of this case. However, considering the fact that the degree of assault is not more severe, the defendant has no record of exceeding the fine, etc., the punishment was determined by taking into account the following factors: the defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, and circumstances after