logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.10.17 2019가합558325
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 263,784,127 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from October 18, 2018 to July 25, 2019.

Reasons

1. The cause of the claim shall be as specified in attached Form;

(However, the “creditor” is deemed to be the “Plaintiff”, and the “debtor” shall be deemed to be the “Defendant”). 2. A judgment rendered as a confession (Articles 208(3)2 and 150(3) and (1) of the Civil Procedure Act), in addition to the reply to the purport of the claim, the reply must state the recognition of each fact recorded in the complaint.

(Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. However, although the defendant submitted a written objection against the payment order on August 5, 2019, the defendant asserted that he/she should raise an objection because he/she is dissatisfied with the payment order, and there is no answer as to the facts alleged by the plaintiff as the cause of the claim, and even on the date of pleading, the written objection against the payment order was made by the plaintiff without being present at the date of pleading, and thus

arrow