1. The Defendant’s KRW 80,500,000 as well as 6% per annum from June 13, 2015 to August 13, 2018 to the Plaintiff.

1. Indication of claims: To be as shown in attached Form of claims;

(Provided, That the “creditor” and “debtor” against the Defendant on February 2, 200: In the written reply, the judgment for deeming confession (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) must state in addition to the reply to the purport of the claim, whether or not the facts recorded in the written complaint are recognized.

(Article 65(1) of the Rules of Civil Procedure. However, even though the Defendant submitted a written objection against the payment order on August 21, 2018, the Defendant asserted that he/she should raise an objection because he/she is dissatisfied with the payment order, and there is no answer as to the facts alleged by the Plaintiff as the cause of the claim, and there is no answer as to the fact that the Plaintiff did not appear on the date of pleading, and the written objection against the payment order was