logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.07.11 2018고단2622
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

1. The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year;

2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of a vehicle B with low investment risk.

On April 21, 2018, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at around 06:40, proceeded with the three-lane road of the 92-5-lane, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-do at a speed that is unrecognized by three-lanes at a flood level from the new bank.

At all times, the victim C(45) is driving with the Dice Track Track Track, so there was a duty of care to ensure the safety distance for those engaged in driving vehicles, to ensure the safety distance, to accurately manipulate the brake and steering gear, and to prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and failed to accurately operate the brake system under the influence of alcohol and received the back part of the foregoing cargo vehicle as the front part of the passenger vehicle operated by the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as catum salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

2. Violation of the Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking), Defendant 1 driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as drinking alcohol to Defendant, a snickly, snickly, on the face, from Defendant F, while driving a motor vehicle with B in a state of drinking at the time and place set forth in the above “1”, and while driving a motor vehicle with B in a state of drinking.

Due to reasonable grounds, there was a demand for responding to the measurement of drinking by inserting approximately 15 minutes into a drinking measuring instrument.

그럼에도 피고인은 음주 측정기에 입김을 불어 넣는 시늉만 하는 방법으로 이를 회피하여 경찰공무원의 음주 측정요구에 응하지 아니하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The investigation report (the main driver’s report) and the main driver; and

arrow