logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.26 2018고단2669
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 8,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of a vehicle B with low investment risk.

On May 3, 2018, the Defendant driven the above car at around 21:36, and proceeded along three-lanes of the three-lanes of the three-lane road at the front city of Suwon-si with the roads adjacent to C in the front city of Suwon-si in the front city of Suwon-si.

At the time, the victim D(47) car K7 passenger cars driven by the victim D(47) is a signal waiting vehicle. In such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely operate by properly operating the steering gear and steering the steering gear.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant’s negligence in the course of business, caused the injury to the injured party F.F. F. (3) who is the victim D and C7 passenger on board the said K7 passenger car by shocking the back part of the said K7 passenger vehicle at the front part of the said vehicle. The Defendant, upon receiving a report from the police officer on 112 after the accident, requested the injured party to comply with a alcohol test, even though he did not comply with it as described in paragraph (2).

2. A defendant who has driven a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol, such as a violation of the Road Traffic Act (Refusal of measurement of drinking), in the same time and place as paragraph (1) of this Article, and a violation of the same Article, from G at the superintendent of the police station belonging to the center of Suwon-gu Police Station, in which he/she was dispatched after having received a report, smelled the defendant in his/her entrance

Despite the fact that there are reasonable grounds to determine a seal, the police officer was requested to comply with the measurement of alcohol by inserting the measuring instrument four times in total from around May 3, 2018 to around 22:58, 2018, but the police officer did not comply with the request for measurement of alcohol without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;

1. Fluore fluoring a black image, fluoring on 1.0

arrow