A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who was engaged in the mobile phone wholesale and retail business with the trade name called Suwon-si C from Suwon-si, the Defendant is a person who was engaged in the mobile phone wholesale and retail business, and E is a person who was engaged in the FF corporation from August 22, 201 to Nov. 1, 2015 as a sponsor repair engineer.

On the other hand, the victim's patriotic fluor did not repair the relevant part or replace the parts with the fluor on the fluor's product failure, but recovered the fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor's fluor'

The Defendant and E: (a) through the use of the fact that the customer is in charge of the work of sending the phone to be repaired by the customer at the Ulsan Center, and delivering the phone to the customer, the Defendant and E: (b) through the use of the fact that the customer was in charge of the work of delivering the phone received from the plug; and (c) through the removal of the phone from which the customer was entrusted to the customer; and (d) by replacing the camera with the reproduction, the Defendant and E conspired to commit theft by sending it to the plos.

Accordingly, around August 2015, E removed from the Fulsan Center located in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, the customer entrusted repair, and the Defendant: (a) removed from the said Ulsan-gu Center, and replaced the mephone with a reproduction, then returned to E; (b) by again delivering the mephone’s grams by means of display; and (c) cut approximately KRW 28 million in total at the market price from around that time to September 2015, the Defendant cut approximately KRW 70,000,000,000 from the same method.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property in collusion with E.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The protocol concerning interrogation of suspects of E by each prosecutor's office;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. Application of the statute outlined by the chief of the complaint, the letter of confirmation of compensation (rest) and the Mali-phone spread system 1.