A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a foreigner of Chinese nationality who is engaged in the export business of parts of mobile phone, C is a person who operates a used mobile phone trading company without a trade name, and D is a person who served as a F repair technician of the Echeon Center from May 2012 to October 2015.

On the other hand, the victim G did not repair the relevant part or replace the parts of the self-processed products with the F, but instead, recovered the damaged F, and instead, operated the Frier system that pays the riphone (a product that made the combination of a part of the reable used part and a new part). E Co., Ltd. entered into an agreement with the said G and operated the F Official Repair Center, and the Defendant, H, C, and D sent the rier that D had a repair entrusted to the customer at the Eth 209 Center, using the fact that D was in charge of the work of delivering the rierphone received from G to the customer, the Defendant, H, C, and D got off the F subject to repair entrusted to the customer, replaced the rier with a reproduction, and conspired to cut off the rier by sending it to G.

Accordingly, D around June 2015, at the Echeon Center located on the fifth floor of Jacheon-si I, the end of 2015, the customer released from the Echeon-si, and delivered it to H. H. The Defendant and C sent it to the Defendant. The Defendant and C replaced the F’s domain from D’s removal to its reproduction, and subsequently returned to D via H. The Defendant and C stolen F’s domains by way of sending off the F with its domains replaced to G. From around that time to September 2015, D cut approximately 120,000 won in total at the market price by the same method between the time and September 2015.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property in collusion with H, C, and D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of a suspect of the prosecution against H or D;

1. Statement made by the prosecution to K;

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Articles seized;