logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.07.07 2017고정596
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a worker in daily employment.

The defendant from March 17, 2016 to the same year.

4. Until June 21, there was no fact that a member of the D Council located in Gwangju Seo-gu C was hospitalized for 21 days due to illness, such as chilling, etc.

Nevertheless, the defendant was hospitalized during the above period.

Upon receipt of a hospitalization certificate, medical expenses receipt, etc., the following month:

6. Submission of a written claim for the payment of insurance proceeds, a written confirmation of hospitalization, etc. to a person in charge of fire in the same household unit of the victim, fire in interest country of the victim, victim NH life insurance, victim ING life, and limited liability insurance for the victims,

7. 4.20,00 won from the victim Hansung Damage Insurance Co., Ltd.; 4.220,000 won from the victim NH Life Insurance Co., Ltd.; 8.40,000 won from the victim ING Life Insurance Co., Ltd.;

8. 840,00 won from a fire insurance company located in the interest country, and the same year.

5. 26. Summary of evidence obtained 80,000 won from the victim's fire insurance company to the defendant's agricultural bank account (E) and acquired 3,20,000 won in total and acquired 3.2 billion won

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police suspect interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. A complaint, a copy of each claim for insurance proceeds, a written confirmation of hospitalization, a medical record and a nursing log, a permanent residence for calculating hospital medical expenses, a copy of the written consent for perusal of medical records and issuance of copies thereof, a request for medical confirmation of communications confirmation, and the application of each statute stated in response data;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “Criminal Procedure Act”) is inadequate and the amount of fraud is not stated.

It is not good to attitude after the crime.

There are nine criminal records for the defendant.

In addition, the sentencing conditions shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, occupation, family relationship, and circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

(b) for more than one year.

arrow