logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.04 2014고단4121
출입국관리법위반
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant: (a) invited foreigners who wish to be employed in the Republic of Korea in the Republic of Korea in connection with the four-party local hub F, domestic hub G, and recruited to enter the Republic of Korea for the purpose of visiting the temple and experiencing the Tbbrotoology; and (b) recruited to obtain the price therefor; and (c) decided that F play a role in recruiting local four-party buyers, preparing and conveying a false invitation letter, and that G is responsible for conducting false inspections.

On February 28, 2012, the Defendant: (a) drafted a letter of invitation stating the false details that the Defendant invites for visiting the Scababab to enter and experience the Sababology; (b) invited four-four foreigners by inviting them to enter the Incheon Airport on March 18, 2012 through the method of submitting data from the Sababan Embassy to the NA Embassy; and (c) assisted them by illegally inviting 26 foreigners by allowing them to enter the Republic of Korea; and (d) the rest of 38 foreigners were refused to enter the Republic of Korea.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copies of each suspect examination protocol of H, G, I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, and Q;

1. A copy of each prosecutor's statement concerning R and G;

1. The current status of short-term visa issuer, personal immigration status, etc., application documents for visa issuance, request for cooperation in investigation and reply, and the current status of short-term visa issuer by inspection;

1. A written accusation;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (No. 11 through 13, 15, 16, 19, 37, 38, 48)

1. Article 94 subparagraph 3 of the Immigration Control Act, Articles 7-2 and 99 (1) of the same Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, the choice of imprisonment for a crime, and the choice of punishment for each type of crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. There is no record of punishment for the same kind of crime as a foreigner under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code, and some of the circumstances leading to each of the crimes in this case are considered, and the degree of participation and the scale of gain acquired.

arrow