Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A: (a) around 10:00 on April 8, 2014, at the “F” parking lot located in Gwangju Mine District E, the victim B (year 37) parked the Defendant’s vehicle in another place, but refused this.

Therefore, the victim said that "the bitch flob, bitch flob, or flob, bitch flob" was "the victim's flob, bitch flob", and assaulted the victim's flob by 10 times the flob by drinking, and flobing the victim's flob, and flocing the victim's flob, which requires treatment for five weeks of flobbly, the victim's flob, etc., and flob

2. Defendant B

A. In the same time and place as set forth in paragraph (1), the injured Defendant saw the victim’s bridge against the victim A (the age of 64)’s actions, and saw the victim’s face face to approximately 5-6 times in drinking, and inflicted an injury on the victim’s cages, tensions, and spawneds, which require two weeks’ treatment.

B. On the ground that the victim G (man, 59 years old) was safed by her husband A and the Defendant, at the same time and place as paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant abused the victim openly by stating that the victim’s name-free cargo 5-6 article 5-6 in the surrounding area was safed, “I am the same hack, humb, and humb,” the victim’s name-free cargo humb.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s partial statement

1. Each legal statement of the witness A, B, G, H, and I;

1. The Defendant A and his defense counsel asserted that there was no injury by assaulting the victim B as indicated in the judgment, as set forth in Paragraph 1 of the judgment, and the Defendant B and their defense counsel asserted that there was no injury by assaulting the victim A, or not insulting the victim G as indicated in Paragraph 2 of the judgment. However, the following circumstances revealed by each evidence of the judgment, i.e., the contents of the statements made by the victims and witnesses, are specific and consistent, and even in light of the degree of attitude in the court, the statements made by the victims and witnesses are made.