Defendant

B A shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for eight months, and by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who is engaged in driving of a DPoter II truck.

On September 8, 2016, the Defendant came to turn to the left at the right angle of the “F” in the front of the “F” in the Si of Jung-Eup, Jung-gu, Jung-do, at the right angle from the repair to the right angle.

Since there is an intersection that does not regulate traffic, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to enter the intersection and drive the motor vehicle by giving the direction device at the time of left-hand turn to the driver of the motor vehicle, and if there is another motor vehicle that is straight at the intersection, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to drive the motor vehicle after driving the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive the vehicle while driving the vehicle by negligence and received the front part of the Glessst Driving Vehicle B (63 S) driving, which is left side of the Defendant’s cargo vehicle, from the right side of the seat to the repair from the right side of the vehicle of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the death of the victim H (V, 75 years of age) who is the partner of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle due to the foregoing occupational negligence, due to multiple traumas, etc. on the job.

2. Defendant B is a person who is engaged in driving a Gunst Car.

On September 8, 2016, the Defendant proceeded with the intersection of “F” in front of the “F” in the Si/Gu of Jeong-Eup, Jung-gu, Jung-do, at the right angle from the side of the west to the right angle of repair.

Since there is an intersection that does not regulate traffic, and the restricted speed is 60km a speed, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the accident by thoroughly putting the front-way vision and complying with the restricted speed.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and negligently driven the speed exceeding 25 km a speed of 25 km a speed from the direction of the driving car of the defendant, to the back side of the repair.