1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a university professor conducting the Maternity movement. 2) The Defendant Company is a press organization that runs the Internet homepage (H) while publishing a daily newspaper “F (hereinafter “F”)”, and Defendant C, D, and E are reporters belonging to the Defendant Company.

B. On September 27, 2018, the Defendant Company posted an article as indicated in the Attachment 5 (hereinafter “instant article”) under the title of “G” on the instant daily newspaper and its Internet homepage, and published a follow-up article with the same content as indicated in the Attachment 3 (hereinafter “instant article”) under the title of “I” on October 9, 2018, and published a follow-up article with the same content as indicated in the Attachment 3 (hereinafter “instant article”).

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 3 and 4 (including each number; hereinafter the same shall apply), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The summary of the Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The Defendants infringed the Plaintiff’s reputation by reporting the first article of this case containing a false statement that “the Plaintiff is the principal operator and distributor of the fake news, who is a religious person, and is a person directly or indirectly related to the J, and is a person directly or indirectly related to the J, and is a person directly related to the J”. Accordingly, the Defendants sought against the Defendant Company the publication of the first correction report in attached Form 1 and the first preliminary publication of the counterargument report in attached Form 2, and sought compensation for damages caused by defamation against the Defendants, as the Plaintiff’s reputation has been continuously infringed through the article 2 of this case.