logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.08 2017고단4526
무고
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On December 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the office of D (State) office operated by the Defendant located in Yongsan-gu, Yongsan-gu; (b) notified the employees E of the said (State) D of false contents; and (c) directed the Defendant to prepare a written complaint; and (d) drafted a false written complaint with respect to F, G, and H.

A written complaint states, "The defendant F, a U.S. F, sold the sex organ of the F, as in the new sex organ of the F, and during that process, G employees of D, in charge of the sex organ of the F, and H, who would have caused damage to the company, and punished as if H purchased the sex organ of the F," and the defendant purchased the sex organ of this case at a higher price of the V, and the above G and H purchased the sex organ of the F with the direction of the defendant to purchase the sex organ of the F, and the above F, while selling the sex organ of the F, there was no fact that the V, Inc. was a new sex organ of the F, while engaging in the sale of the sex organ of this article.

Nevertheless, on December 23, 2016, the Defendant submitted the above written complaint to a police officer who is unable to know his/her name at the police station of Seodaemun-gu, Incheon Metropolitan Government, which is located in 2469, No. 32, a 2469, and on January 6, 2017, the police station of Seodaemun-gu, Seodaemun-gu, which appeared as the complainant in the above F, G, and H, and stated false facts.

Accordingly, the defendant was committed for the purpose of having F, G, and H receive criminal punishment.

2. The judgment of this Court

A. The gist of the Defendant’s assertion was F to consider and purchase the foregoing be-type type technology as new products in the process of purchasing be-type technology from the U.S. I to F, and there was no intention to mislead the Defendant.

B. In full view of the following circumstances revealed by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court, the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone is reasonable.

arrow