The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

On February 4, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 16:00 on February 4, 2012, the Defendant: (b) prevented customers from entering the restaurant by having a disturbance, such as raising money in the E-cafeteria operated by the Victim D; (c) raising sound; and (d) cutting off the phone at the market price of 85,000 won, which is the victim’s possession in the Kabter; and (d) 2) 3:00.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property and interfered with the victim's mid-to-day restaurant business by force.

Each of the statements in D and F's investigation agencies and courts that seem to be fit for the facts charged in the market shall be hard to believe in light of the contents of the statement by the defendant and G, and there is no other sufficient evidence to recognize it otherwise.

Therefore, the facts charged in this case constitute the absence of proof of crime, and thus, is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.