A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On February 2, 2017, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B that “A person who is currently in operation in the Republic of Korea is an operator of the apartment construction project that takes place in the building site of 40,000 square meters in Echeon-si D Special Metropolitan City, and at the next month, the construction project will begin immediately with the investment deposit of 140 billion won in the United States, and at the next month, the amount of KRW 30,000,000,000 is expected to begin immediately.” The Defendant made a false statement to the victim B that “A will subcontract the Model Eas Project and the Civil Works Project for an apartment that is in operation in the Republic of Korea in Echeon-si Special Metropolitan City.”

However, there was no actual contract for construction work, and the owners of the above D D D D related land did not have any fact that they agreed to sell the above land to the defendant, and thus, they did not have any economic ability. The defendant was in the state of being a basic living beneficiary at the time, and there was no investment amount equivalent to KRW 140 billion to the defendant in the United States. The defendant did not have the ability or intent to subcontract the apartment model cargo construction work and the civil engineering work to the victim even if he received money from the victim as the consideration for the subcontract agreement.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim to the account under the name of the Defendant for the consideration of the subcontract agreement around February 8, 2017.

[Defendant and defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not deception the victim and that there was no intention to obtain fraud, but this court has duly adopted and investigated the evidence as follows, the apartment construction project that the defendant or the Dispute Settlement Bank Co., Ltd. carries out at the D,00 square meters and 40,000 square meters (hereinafter "the project of this case").

any one of the above projects, which is the competent authorities, with respect to the viewing of Echeon.