1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The following facts may be found either in dispute between the parties or in combination with the whole purport of the pleadings in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 4, evidence 7-1, 2, Eul evidence 1, 9, and 10:

1) The Plaintiff and the Defendants’ store ownership 1) The Plaintiff is Ansan-gu Diplomatic Family (hereinafter referred to as “Diplomatic Family”) in Ansan-si.

(2) No. 106, 22, 206, 200, 2206, 33.26m2, 2002, 202, hereinafter “store No. 106”).

[Attachment 1] and 107 [Attachment 27.64m2, December 17, 2004] and [Attachment 107] and [Attachment 107].]

(2) Defendant C is the owner of the D shop Nos. 22, 116, and 121 (hereinafter “store No. 116”), and Defendant C is the owner of the D shop No. 22, 116, and 121 (hereinafter “store No. 121”) and Defendant B is the owner of the D shop No. 22, 105 (hereinafter “No. 105 store”) and 118 (hereinafter “No. 118”).

3) On October 4, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendants’ store use 1) leased the store No. 106 to E with a lease deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 600,000,000 from October 4, 2012 to October 3, 2014 (hereinafter “the lease of this case”). E paid all the instant lease deposit to the Plaintiff and started business of beauty art room with the trade name “F” at the store No. 106. However, around April 2014, the Plaintiff terminated the instant lease contract and closed business of the said beauty art room with the name “F” at the store No. 106.

On the other hand, from December 2004, the store No. 107, owned by the plaintiff, owned by the plaintiff, continued to be a public room from December 2004.

2. Since May 20, 2008, Defendant C’s Nos. 116, 121, and 120, which were leased from its own stores and third parties from May 20, 208.