The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

At around 23:00 on March 13, 2018, the Defendant: (a) was trying to take a taxi in front of the “C” road located in Young-si B; (b) on the ground that the victim D (the age of 25) flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick flick; and (c) the victim flick flick flick flick flick flick flds

The defendant asserts that even though the victim's chest was pushed down at the time of the instant case, the defendant did not agree to walk the victim's bridge as stated in the facts charged, and therefore, the injury inflicted on the right side part of the victim sustained is irrelevant to the defendant's act.

Judgment

Inasmuch as the victim’s statement is flexible as direct evidence of the instant crime, and there is no objective evidence such as video, etc. directly recorded by the victim, the issue of whether to acknowledge the guilty of the facts charged depends on the credibility of the victim’s statement.

According to the medical records against the victim, the victim may be recognized the fact that he was diagnosed with the “satisfe satch” at the hospital following the following day of this case. As to the specific injury circumstances, the victim stated in the police investigation that the victim stated, “I tried to batfe satfe satfe sat, and bate sate satfe sat sat and ebbbbbb sat sat sate sat satfs at the time of reporting verbally at the time of reporting, but I tried to go beyond satfe sat and increase in prices.”

However, the victim's appearance at the court is unsatisfying accurately the situation at the time of this case, but rather, the victim's left side of the bridge while the defendant gets over, is excessive.