logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.12.16 2016가합3732
용역비
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 445,50,000 and the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 6% from January 31, 2015 to February 22, 2016.

Reasons

1. Around August 2014, the Plaintiff engaged in a basic fact-finding design business, etc. entered into a construction design contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant, which was planned by the Defendant to carry out the construction and sale business with the Defendant, for the construction and sale of the building, the construction design contract for the construction of the construction-based Knowledge Industry Center of Young-dong 250-4 Ground Light-dong (hereinafter “instant building”). Of the terms and conditions of the said contract, the part related to the instant

1. Project name: A new project of constructing a knowledge industry center in the structures of tolerance;

4. Contract area: 18,647.27§³ (35,891 square meters).

5. Contract amount: The sale price of KRW 1,678,000 in daily gold ( KRW 1,678,000): Article 3 (Scope, etc. of Contracts) separate from the surtax.

Article 4 (Calculation of Consideration and Method of Payment) (2) The remuneration for the design business may be paid in lump sum or in installments.

(3) Where the price is paid in installments, the time of payment and the amount of payment shall be determined as follows and the service cost shall be paid in cash:

When a non-fixed-term contract for the payment rate of KRW 145,200,000 upon receipt of the separate approval for the construction permit of KRW 819,550,000,000 when the separate approval for the construction permit of KRW 545,500,000 when the separate approval for the construction permit of KRW 167,80,000,000 when the separate approval for the construction permit of KRW 1678,000,000 when the separate approval for the construction permit of KRW 167,80,000,000 is granted, Article 8 (Preparation and Submission of Design Documents) Section B (referring to the plaintiff.) shall comply with the criteria for the preparation of

(4) A (referring to a defendant; hereinafter the same shall apply) may examine the results submitted by B and request B to supplement them, if there are clear grounds, such as design errors.

The plaintiff prepared the design drawings of the building of this case under the above contract and submitted them to the defendant.

(A) A total floor area of 118,647.27 square meters; hereinafter “instant design documents”). The Defendant shall be based on the said design documents on January 30, 2015.

arrow