1. Of the judgment of the first instance, KRW 1,068,759,120 against the Plaintiff among the judgment of the court of first instance, and the Plaintiff’s aforementioned costs from July 22, 2018 to January 17, 2020.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On September 30, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a building design contract between the Plaintiff and the Defendant with respect to the extension, substantial repair, and alteration of the purpose of the use of the building for the purpose of design, authorization, and permission related to the extension, substantial repair, and alteration of the use of the building “TD located in Daegu North-gu (hereinafter “instant building”)” implemented by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant design contract”).

The main contents of the design contract of this case are as follows. (B) The contents of the design contract of this case are as follows: Extension, substantial repair, and alteration of the purpose of use - neighborhood living facilities, accommodation facilities (living accommodation facilities) contract amount: Article 2 (Contract Area and Period of Value-Added Tax Separate) of 986,59,200 won (value-Added Tax): 2. The contract period: Article 3 (Scope, etc. of Contract) of the [Attachment Table 1] of the "Scope of Building Design Business and Quality Standards Table" of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs No. 2009-1092 refers to the "Scope of Building Design Business and Quality Standards Table" of attached Table 1 [Attachment Table 1] of the standard design contract of the building (Article 209-1092).

(3)