logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원성남지원 2012.11.21 2012가합2299
채무부존재확인
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On December 6, 2003, the Minister of Construction and Transportation designated and publicly announced the Korea Housing Corporation (Korea National Housing Corporation and Korea Land Corporation were merged into Defendant on October 1, 2009; hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) as the executor of the instant housing site development project, and publicly announced the change of designation of the planned housing site development area and the approval of the housing site development plan on November 26, 2004.

B. The defendant, as his dwelling is incorporated into the housing site development project district of this case, intended to take measures for the relocation of the people who lose their living base due to the expropriation of his own housing or land, etc., to specially sell the site for detached housing to them within the housing site development project district of this case.

C. Accordingly, during the period from August 25, 2009 to April 201, the Plaintiffs are attached to the separate sheet from the Defendant’s land for detached houses within the instant housing site development project zone.

2. The sales contract was concluded in which each lot number listed in the calculation table (2), (3) land of each area listed in the same calculation table (4) is to be sold in lots with each amount listed in the same calculation table as sales price (hereinafter “each sales contract of this case”), or succeeded to the rights and obligations of each sales contract of this case from the seller before the filing of the lawsuit of this case.

The plaintiffs shall attach attached Form according to each sales contract of this case.

2. The Defendant paid the sales price in full by each date specified in paragraph 5.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Eul's evidence 6-1 to 48, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The laws that form the basis of each of the contracts for sale in this case, which form the plaintiffs' claims, acquire land for public works and acquire them.

arrow