1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Date of lease of recognition;

7. Use fee of 450,000 won of 4,50,000 won of 4,50,000 won of 4,50,000 won of 4,50,000 won of 4,50,000 won of 4,50,000 won of 4,50,000 won of 4,50,000 won on July 14, 197, 198

A. The Plaintiff’s request from the Defendant for the same year from July 11, 2016

8. Until March 8, 200, a construction company of Chungcheong Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “YAD”) was a prime contractor, and the Defendant leased a complaint work vehicle to the construction site of an urban residential housing site of the YAcheon-2 District Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant construction site”), a subcontractor, on eight occasions, and the user fee is as follows:

B. On August 5, 2016, the Defendant entered into an agreement on the share of KRW 900,000,000 for the charges for the instant accusation vehicles and the instant accusation vehicles to be paid by the Defendant, and the remainder KRW 3350,000,000,000 for the Defendant paid to the Defendant and to be paid by the Chungcheong Comprehensive Construction.

C. Upon the Defendant’s request, the Plaintiff issued a tax invoice of KRW 900,000 (including value-added tax) for the two-minutes of the instant complaint work car with the Defendant as the recipient, and the tax invoice of KRW 3350,000 (including value-added tax) for the remainder of the complaint work car with the amount of KRW 3355,00,000 (including value-added tax) was issued as the person who is supplied with a comprehensive construction.

On August 18, 2016, the Defendant paid KRW 990,000 (including value added tax) to the Plaintiff the fee for the second part of the instant complaint work.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. The Plaintiff’s determination on the Plaintiff’s claim is claiming to the Defendant for the remainder of KRW 3,50,000,000 (excluding value-added tax) that has not been paid out of the rent for accusation work leased at the construction site of this case.

According to the above facts, the defendant requesting the lease of the instant accusation work vehicle, barring special circumstances, shall file a request with the plaintiff for the rent of KRW 350,000,000 to the plaintiff and the plaintiff for this.