logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.11.22 2016가단16338
건물명도 등
Text

1. The defendant against the plaintiffs

(a) deliver the real estate listed in the separate sheet;

B. From May 26, 2016, KRW 5450,00 and above.

Reasons

1. Determination

A. In full view of the purport of the argument in the statement in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, the plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the defendant on October 19, 2015, with a deposit of KRW 10 million, monthly rent of KRW 900,000 (which shall be paid later on October 26, 2015, KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 won (which shall be separate from value added tax), and the period from October 26, 2015 to October 26, 2016 (hereinafter "the lease agreement of this case"). The defendant entered into the lease agreement of this case with the defendant on April 6, 2016, with the delivery of the real estate of this case under the lease agreement of this case, and the defendant notified the defendant of the lease agreement of KRW 60,500,000,000,000,000,00.

B. As to this, the Defendant used the instant real estate, paid a part of the monthly rent, received an extension of the date by the Plaintiffs’ verbally, and paid the unpaid monthly rent by the end of November 2016, and thus, cannot accept the Plaintiffs’ claim. However, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant received an extension of the date from the Plaintiffs, and there is no remainder.

arrow