logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2014.10.24 2014구합20061
교육훈련시설지정 취소 처분 취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The party-related Plaintiff is a person who operates the C Education Center in charge of education and training to train infant care teachers (hereinafter “instant Education Center”).

B. On May 7, 2013, D received KRW 2,00,000 from 2,000 to 3,000,000 from 3,000,000 from the head of the education center for infant care teachers in the area of Hongnam-do, and reported that it is under investigation at the Seoul Song-gu Police Station on suspicion of having obtained a false certificate of completion after issuing the certificate of completion. 2) The Defendant conducted self-inspection of education and training facilities for infant care teachers in the Gyeongnam-do, and conducted an investigation into the instant education center on May 30, 203.

3) However, as a result of the inspection, the Defendant discovered the fact that E, who received a certificate of completion on December 30, 2008 at the instant education center, was not indicated in the list of trainees reported by the Plaintiff to the Defendant in 2008. (c) On the other hand, the Seoul Songpa Police Station requested an administrative disposition against the Plaintiff and E, etc. on October 1, 2013, based on the violation of the Infant Care Act.

2) On October 7, 2013, the Defendant issued a false certificate of completion to the Plaintiff on the grounds that he/she issued the certificate of completion to the Plaintiff, which falls short of the recognition criteria for the completion of education and training facilities. 3) On October 24, 2013, the Defendant held the hearing procedure on October 24, 2013. The Plaintiff issued a false certificate of completion to E who did not complete the permitted curriculum, and stated to the effect that E opened and trained the weekend special class as the relation in which E resides in Seoul.

1) The Defendant’s revocation of the designation of education and training facilities is subject to the deliberation and resolution by the Infant Care Policy Committee on December 4, 2013, and on December 12, 2013, the former Enforcement Rule of the Infant Care Act (Ordinance of the Ministry for Health, Welfare and Family Affairs, July 3, 2009).

arrow