A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 14, 2014, around 07:30 on December 14, 2014, the Defendant lodged a dispute with D, which is a backboard, within the “C” restaurant located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and publicly insulting the victim by openly insulting the victim on the following grounds: (a) the developments leading up to the police box belonging to the victim, Yeongdeungpo-gu Police Station Eaba, who called to the scene after having received 112 reports, the Defendant attempted to confirm the above reported fact to the Defendant; and (b) the victim’s employees and the number of customers on the job where the victim is well-known.

2. At the above time and place of obstruction of performance of official duties, the Defendant: (a) did not reveal the Defendant’s junating that the police box F, etc. affiliated with the police box F, and did not reveal the Defendant’s personal information about the circumstances leading up to the damage of cooling cryp inside the above restaurant; (b) notified the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of property damage and insult by talking about false phone numbers; and (c) notified the Defendant to arrest the Defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of property damage and insult; (d) took the Defendant’s face on one occasion by carrying on the patrol; and (e) pushed the Defendant at one time.

As above, the Defendant assaulted Gman and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police protocol of F, G, and H;

1. A written statement of I and J;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Photographs of a victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (field situation and witness);

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (six months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the obstruction of performance of official duties) (the special person) [the decision of sentence] defendant is a police officer in the execution of official duties.