beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the first instance court between the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) C and the Defendants, the selected parties A Q and R part shall be revoked.
3.2
Reasons
1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the arguments in Gap evidence No. 9, the court of △△△ (attached Form 2)’s judgment on the legitimacy of the lawsuit against Appointors A and AR, it is identical to the △△△△ (attached Form 1) No. 2278 on July 1545 on the Selected List No. 2278 on the Selected List, and (attached Form 2) AR is the same as the No. 2351 on the Selected List No. 1302 on the Selected List No. 1302 on the Selected List. The △△△△△ and AR filed a lawsuit seeking damages against the defendant D and the defendant E on July 26, 2011 on which the court of △△△△ rendered a claim against the aforementioned Appointor A and AR on which the judgment became final and conclusive, and both the appeal against the defendant A and the appeal against which the judgment became final and conclusive.
Therefore, the lawsuit of this case against the appointed party A Q, the defendant D, and the defendant E among the lawsuit of this case by the plaintiff (Appointed party) C is unlawful since it is sought the same as the judgment of winning the lawsuit of this case has already become final and conclusive.
In addition, the plaintiff (Appointed Party)'s lawsuit against the remaining Defendants of A Q and AR among the lawsuit in this case is identical to the lawsuit in this case filed by the plaintiff (Appointed Party), the National Teachers' Union of Korea, A, and B (attached Form 1) as the designated party in the list of the designated parties, and it is unlawful as it constitutes a duplicate lawsuit.
Ultimately, the part of the lawsuit in this case by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) A Q and AR (attached Form 2) is unlawful.
[Attachment 2] In the following cases, the designated parties listed in the list of the designated parties (attached Form 2] refer to the remaining designated parties except the above designated parties]
2. The facts below the basis facts do not conflict between the parties, or the evidence Nos. 1 to 11, 13, 15, 22, 33 to 41, and Eul No. 7.