logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.11.15 2012가합7002
손해배상청구 등
Text

1. Defendant Daep&D Co., Ltd. is attached Form 2.3 to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The “Appointed” column in the list of the Appointeds No. 1. 1. List refers to the Plaintiff (Appointeds) and the Appointeds (hereinafter referred to as the “Appointeds”) together with the Appointeds, if they refer to the Plaintiffs and the Appointeds.

(C) The apartment of this case (hereinafter “the apartment of this case”) located on the part of Defendant Daepnnn&D and D and one parcel of land in the Gongju-si.

In order to manage the apartment of this case 389 households, the plaintiff's council of occupants' representatives is an autonomous management body composed of the occupants. 2) The defendant Woond is a business entity that constructed and sold the apartment of this case. The defendant Woond is a company that constructed the apartment of this case by receiving a new construction contract for the apartment of this case from the defendant Woonnd, and the defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association is a company that constructed the apartment of this case by receiving a new construction contract for the apartment of this case.

The company that entered into the warranty contract for the apartment of this case is the company.

B. From April 2007 to November 201, 2010, the buyers of the Plaintiff LAW and the Plaintiff who concluded the sales contract with the Defendant LAWD entered into a sales contract with respect to each of the relevant apartment units indicated in the “Dong-dong and lake” column of the claim amount attached to the attached Form 2 among the apartment units of this case (hereinafter “each of the instant sales contracts”). The number of the buyers of the Plaintiff is 293 households in total.

C. On April 23, 2009, Defendant Samdo Community and Defendant Samdo Community enter into a contract for the warranty of defects (hereinafter “each guarantee contract of this case”) with the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association and the guaranty creditor as a public viewing on April 23, 2009, as set forth in the table 1 through 5 below (hereinafter “each guarantee contract of this case”).

The term “guarantee” was concluded. The warranty period (from April 30, 2009 to April 29, 2010 to April 29, 2010) was 477,968,160 until April 29, 201, 303: (i) April 30, 201 to April 29, 201; (ii) 716,952, 2404 to April 29, 2012 from April 30, 2009 to April 29, 2012; and (iii)58,476, 1205, April 30 to April 29, 2014.

arrow