logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 포항지원 2014.07.17 2014고단104
사기등
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months for the crimes of No. 1, 3, or 4 in the judgment of the defendant, and by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 13, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year for a violation of the Military Service Act in the Daegu District Court Branch Branch of the District Court on December 13, 2012, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 21, 2012.

"2014 Highest 104"

1. The Defendant’s fraud is between C and C and C, and C, D, E, and F are between friendships.

D around May 2012, it decided to commit insurance fraud by means of a method of intentionally purchasing a large number of insurance policies and paying insurance proceeds by causing a traffic accident. At that time, the Defendant, F, E, and the Defendant were proposed to commit an insurance fraud. In response, D is responsible for the overall formulation of the crime plan, designation of roles, distribution of criminal proceeds, securing of preparations such as vehicles using accidents, etc., C provides D with transportation necessary at the time of preparing and implementing the crime, withdrawing the insurance proceeds deposited in the account, and arranging D to play a role of causing an accident on board the prepared vehicle after having subscribed to insurance under his/her own name.

According to the above public offering, the Defendant and D, C, E, and F completed the preparation for insurance coverage and vehicle preparation until June 1, 2012, and on June 2, 2012, the Defendant: (a) sold E and F to G beetian vehicles prepared in advance; and (b) driven the said vehicle on the first upper left right line of the road located in the south-gu H at the port, caused a traffic accident in which the Defendant intentionally conflicts with E and F; and (c) received a false report from July 10, 2012 as if the said accident was a traffic accident caused by negligence, and (d) received a false report from the victim, as if the said accident was a traffic accident caused by negligence.

7. By the 18th day, each insurance company claimed insurance proceeds.

Accordingly, the defendant and D, C, E, and F are the victims of further case damage insurance companies.

arrow