1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the above sentence shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 9, 2015, Defendant A received a report from 112 on the H’s street in front of the Hasung-gun, Gosung-gun, G and received a request to present an identification card from the police officer assigned to the site, who was dispatched to the site, and took a bath to refuse to present an identification card, and threatened the police officer’s vessel with smuggling and drinking.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on 112 reporting handling affairs.

2. The Defendant Company B, at the time, and at the place of the preceding paragraph, was arrested in flagrant offender A due to the foregoing reasons, resisting the arrest of the Defendant for the foregoing reasons. Defendant B, who was the first time and place of the preceding paragraph, sent back back the lower part of the police officer J, and sent back the head of K (50) in the background of the victimized person.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by the police officers related to the arrest of flagrant offenders, and at the same time, the Defendant inflicted injury on the above victim K, such as cerebral celeba which requires medical treatment for about 14 days.

3. The Defendant, at the time, at the time, and at a place specified in the preceding paragraph, Da, the Defendant, who was working for the Defendant, resisted to arrest a flagrant offender for the foregoing reason, and was able to capture concrete sculptures (fix 12 cm wide, 8cm high, 6cm high, 6cm high) that are dangerous things around the scene, and her desire to J to her, and “sever her nearby the scene.”

The threat, such as “,” was continued to threaten B B to arrest him in the act of committing an offense, and a threat was made as if he were to wear the work uniform after the defect.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with respect to K, J, M and L;

1. Each investigation report (each photograph, video CD and caps photograph), and internal investigation report (the injury diagnosis report);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the 112 Reporting Case Handling List;

1. Defendant A of the relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts