logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.10.24 2019고단4335
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Prior to the operation of the dental technician in Gwangju Metropolitan City, while the Defendant was operating the dental technician in Gwangju Metropolitan City, only borne the liability of approximately KRW 30 million by operating the dental technician, and thereafter, the office was leased KRW 160 million and opened the dental technician by selling it in lots. However, as the dental technician was also established, an application for rehabilitation was filed, which was partially reduced in the amount of debts, and the head of the Tong in the name of the Defendant was established in around 2014, but it was still not possible to get loans from the financial institution due to bad credit standing, and there was no specific income or property other than KRW 5 million in the deposit money for the dental laboratory around August 2015.

1. On August 10, 2015, the Defendant was transferred KRW 75 million from the victim who believed that “If the Defendant would extend the dental equipment construction business, and if the Defendant would lend KRW 150 million to the new dental equipment construction business in Echeon because the money is insufficient, the Defendant would pay KRW 300 million per annum to the Defendant’s bank account in his name on August 10, 2015, the Defendant was transferred KRW 75 million to the Defendant’s bank account in his name.”

9.7. The Defendant’s wife C received KRW 75 million from the national bank account in the name of the Defendant’s wife C

2. On November 2015, the Defendant was transferred KRW 30 million to the bank account in the name of the Defendant on November 2015, 2015, to the Defendant’s reliance on the following purport: “The Defendant was able to repay KRW 30 million if he/she borrowed additional KRW 30 million to the bank account in the name of the Defendant.”

3. In other words, on April 4, 2016, the Defendant received a remittance of KRW 45 million from the victim’s beliefing that “If the Defendant calls the victim to the early police officer and said that “if he/she continues to enter the flag construction business, he/she will complete the payment immediately as arranged, if he/she additionally lends 45 million won to the flag’s account in the name of the Defendant’s wife C Bank.”

However, at the time of fact.

arrow