logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2020.04.08 2020고단150
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 17, 2008, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 6 months for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon-gu branch on December 17, 2008. On May 26, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for 6 months for the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Daegu District Court on May 26, 2016, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of 2 years for the same drinking and non-licensed driving power of 4 times in total.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Around 19:40 on October 30, 2016, the Defendant driven a F string-man car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 200 meters alcohol concentration of 0.192% from the section of approximately 200 meters from the road near the C-Sinan City, Chungcheongnam-si, Seoul to the front road of the E-building located in D.

Accordingly, the defendant, who violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice, was driving a motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol again.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of the same Article without obtaining a driver’s license.

Around 22:30 on January 25, 2020, the Defendant received 112 reports from the head of the Gu/U.S. police station I police station that called “H” in the front of the “H” located in the Gu/U.S. Gyeong-si, North Korea, on the ground that K, who is his/her seat, is required to measure drinking and the said police officer’s crypted to “strop, bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bit bits.” On the other hand, the Defendant assaulted the above police officer on several occasions on his/her shoulders by hand on the ground that K, who is his/her seat, is required to measure drinking alcohol.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

[200 Highest 150]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the situation of a drinking driver, and inquiry into the results of the regulation of drinking driving;

1. Registers of driver's licenses and disqualified meetings of the main office;

1. Previous records of judgment: Criminal records, reply reports, written judgments, etc. (2020 highest 199);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. J.

arrow