beta
Text
1. The part against the plaintiff falling under the following order of payment among the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked:
The defendant.
Reasons
1. In the first instance court’s judgment, the Plaintiff sought compensation for property damage and consolation money against the Defendant on December 18, 2010 and April 29, 201. The court of first instance accepted part of the claim for compensation for property damage and consolation money based on the accident as of December 18, 2010 while dismissing the claim based on the accident as of December 18, 201.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff appealed on the part of the claim for property damage based on the insured on April 29, 201, and the Defendant appealed on the part of the claim for property damage and the part of the claim for consolation money based on the foregoing insured event. Thus, the subject of the judgment of this court is limited to the part of the claim for compensation for property damage based on the insured on April 29, 201,
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. Facts 1) The defendant is a corporation operating passenger transport business, and the plaintiff is a maintenance worker who maintains the vehicle at the defendant's B's business office. 2) On April 29, 201, the day when the accident occurred (i.e., the plaintiff, etc., the maintenance worker, including the plaintiff, ordered the plaintiff at the defendant's B business office on April 29, 201, to replace the hard disc of the bus C (hereinafter "accident vehicle"), and did not set the air-line with the lock (safety pin) for prompt maintenance.
Shebly, the Plaintiff had been engaged in the maintenance work under the bottom of the accident vehicle at around 13:10 after the same day, divided the eropart, which was being driven by the accident vehicle, into a sudden landing and an accident vehicle, and thereby suffered injury, such as the pressure frame of the 1st half of the drilling, the 12nd of the chlost, etc.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). (b)
According to the facts of recognition of liability, the defendant, as an employer, maintains a physical environment so that the plaintiff, as an employer, does not harm his/her life and body in the course of providing his/her labor.