(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.10 2017나306639

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.01.10 2017나306639

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals by Plaintiff A against Defendant E and appeals by Plaintiff B against Defendant F Co., Ltd. are dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Acknowledgement of the scope of judgment of this court and judgment of the first instance;

A. In the first instance trial, Plaintiff A claimed damages due to injury to Defendant E (treatment cost, consolation money), damages due to accusation or accusation, and damages due to transmission of text messages. Plaintiff B claimed damages due to nonperformance of the procedure for change of the title of building permit and damages due to the execution of an unfair provisional injunction against disposal against the Defendant F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Company”). The court of first instance rejected Plaintiff A’s claim for damages due to injury, the part of the claim for damages due to the transmission of text messages, and the part of the claim for damages due to accusation or accusation, and the part of the claim for damages due to the complaint or accusation against the Defendant Company B, while the judgment dismissing Plaintiff B’s claim against the Defendant Company.

With respect to this, the part against the plaintiff A in the judgment of the court of first instance appealed only to the part of the claim for damages caused by the transmission of text messages, and the part of the claim for damages caused by the transmission of text messages in the judgment of the court of first instance added to the part of the claim for damages caused by the transmission of text messages and the part of the claim for damages caused by the accusation and accusation in the judgment of the court of first instance, but each of the above claims was simply combined. The plaintiff A stated that this court did not appeal for the part of the claim for damages caused by the accusation and accusation in the amount of KRW 30 million,00,000,000 and KRW 20,000,000,000 due to the transmission of text messages messages and KRW 30,000.

The remaining parts were not appealed, and the plaintiff B appealed only against the claim for damages caused by the failure to comply with the procedure for the change of the name of building permit, and it is apparent in the record that the remaining parts were not appealed, and the defendants did not appeal against the judgment of the court of first instance.

Therefore, the scope of this Court's adjudication is the transmission of text messages to the defendant A.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2018.08.23 2018나641

-대법원 1966. 3. 22. 선고 66다172 판결

-서울고등법원 2018.11.14 2017나2072295

-광주지방법원 2016.06.17 2015나56662

-서울고등법원 2019.05.02 2018나2033563