The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (one year and six months of imprisonment) against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant was fully aware of the commission of the crime and reflects the mistake in depth, and that there are no circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the crime.

However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was sentenced one time to suspended sentence for the same crime; and (b) the instant crime was committed without being aware of the fact that the Defendant was committed a repeated offense even though it was committed; (c) the considerable part of the damage was not recovered; and (d) the victims did not receive a letter from the victims; and (c) other special circumstances are not presented to change the sentence of the lower court in the trial; and (d) other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the Defendant’s age, career, and family relationship, the lower court’s sentence

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.