The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of the lower court (four months of imprisonment) against the Defendant on the summary of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the Defendant’s health was not good, when all of the crimes were committed in the first instance, and the Defendant’s convictions against the wrongness.

However, the crime of this case was committed by a similar recipient company with significant characteristics of the crime, such as causing a large number of victims to suffer severe economic difficulties, and the defendant was sentenced one time suspension of execution and one sentence to commit the crime of this case before the crime of this case, which was committed one time before the crime of this case, without being aware of the fact that the crime of this case was committed even though it was committed a repeated crime, most of the damage was not recovered, and the victims did not receive a letter of suspicion; the court below has already determined punishment by taking into account the equity between the case where the first crime of this case in the judgment became final and conclusive, and other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, career, family relation, etc., it is not recognized that the punishment imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition, since the defendant's appeal is without merit.