A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On April 13, 2016, at around 23:45, the Defendant reported on April 13, 2016 that “the Defendant shall take away goods” at the Defendant’s residence located in Gwangju-si 104 Dong 101, Gwangju-si, and was asked questions concerning the circumstances of the instant case from the assistant D belonging to the Gwangju Police Station C commander of the police station, the police officer, and the police officer, who called to the site;

Scar scars enter the house and dominate in the house.

“The clothes, which are dangerous articles located in a ward with sound, were blicked by flaging the clothes (1.5m in length) and flaging the above D and E, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the performance of duties by police officers on handling 112 reported duties and maintaining public order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. A written statement of G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field photographs, furnic photographs and motion pictures taken by a suspect, on the face of a crime;

1. Article 144 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following sentencing shall be considered in light of the favorable circumstances in the light of the attention);

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act, the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the age, sexual behavior, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., shall be determined with the same sentence as the order.

Unfavorable circumstances: The crime of this case is used for violence against police officers performing official duties, and the crime of this case is not good.

Furthermore, it is more so in light of the fact that the police officer in question performed official duties related to the defendant's mistake (domestic violence).

There are many damaged police officers, and they are dangerous objects in the damaged police officers.

Defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime.

The defendant. The defendant.