logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.04.20 2018노438
사기등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (one year and eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment in addition to twice fines, the fact that the crime of this case was caused by pressure from customer attraction, the fact that he neglected management such as the confirmation of the letter of law borrowing the name, and the fact that he is responsible for the expansion of damage to erognbbbbs of erogn, the defendant paid 79,570,434 out of the amount of damage to erognbs of erogn, and the fact that he paid erognbs of erogn, the amount of damage to erognbs and teachers is calculated on the basis of the fixed price of the sold goods, and the substantial

However, the crime of this case is highly likely to be committed in view of the method of crime and the amount of damage due to the case where the defendant acquired 325,89,441 won from the victim erogic Big by means of making the most contract using the victim's personal information that he borrowed from another person's name or learned in his business without permission, and acquired 59,40,000 won from the victim erogic Big Big, and acquired 8,040,000 won from the victim erogic Big, and acquired 8,000 won from the borrowed money, and acquired 8,000,000 won from the victim erogic Big, the crime against the victim erogic Big is committed in the course of being investigated by the police due to the fraud of the victim erogic Big, most of the damage is not repaid, and other various circumstances revealed in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, sex, family, support relationship, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime.

There are no circumstances such as evaluation or maintenance of it is deemed unfair.

Therefore, since the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

arrow